>>>>> On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 07:53:47 +0100, >>>>> Gregor GORJANC (GG) wrote:
> Hi! > What is wrong if there would be the same command? 2 reasons: 1) I try to keep the Sweave and LaTeX namespaces disjunct, i.e., I currently do not overload regular LaTeX commands with a different meaning, and I want to keep it that way. 2) If it is "the same" command, then I you can already take bets on the date of the first "bug report" claiming that Sweave's \input{} command behaves differently that LaTeX's, e.g., by not searching .Rnw files along the TEXINPUTS path, etc. I currently also plan only a \SweaveInput{}, but no \SweaveInclude{} (the former is much easier to implement, because I don't have to switch output files in the middle of operation). > Recall my example from > previous posts and at the end of this mail. If I have a file a.Rnw and this > one inputs file a1.Rnw. My idea was that Sweave would check \input{a1} or > \include{a1} statements. If file a1 would have extension .Rnw it would > parse it otherwise (i.e. having .tex) it would skip it. Sweave would just > parse .Rnw files, while latex would put all of them in one file during > typesetting. > Example: > - we have files > a.Rnw, which has \input{a1} or \include{a1} > a1.Rnw Note that theese are *not* the same under LaTeX > - run Sweave(a.Rnw) and you get > a.tex > a1.tex Nope, for \input{a1} you would get only a.tex. From the LaTeX documentation: ********************************************************** `\input{file}' The `\input' command causes the indicated `file' to be read and processed, exactly as if its contents had been inserted in the current file at that point. The file name may be a complete file name with extension or just a first name, in which case the file `file.tex' is used. ********************************************************** That is easy to implement, because I read the .Rnw file, replace (recursively) all \SweaveInput{} statements with their contents until no more \SweaveInput{} statements are found (here the unique name comes in handy ;-) and then process as usual. If you want a fancier system with include statements I am happily waiting for your code implementing it. Best, Fritz -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Friedrich Leisch Institut für Statistik Tel: (+43 1) 58801 10715 Technische Universität Wien Fax: (+43 1) 58801 10798 Wiedner Hauptstraße 8-10/1071 A-1040 Wien, Austria http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~leisch ______________________________________________ R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html