"Paul Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > Does this do what you want? > > layout(rbind(c(1, 2, 3), > c(0, 4, 0))) > plot(1:10, main="Plot 1") > plot(1:20, main="Plot 2") > plot(1:30, main="Plot 3") > plot(1:40, main="Plot 4") > # new page! > plot(1:40, main="Plot 5")
Yes, that works nicely. Thank you very much. I tried this wrapped with a pdf/dev.off and it works great: pdf("test.pdf") <plot statements here> dev.off() I guess I should always use layout and avoid using mfrow or mfcol, since it's more flexible in general. I can't decide if the existing behavio(u)r of mfrow/mfcol is a "bug" or a "feature" when some plots are to be left blank, and one wants to advance to the next figure. With your solution, I won't need to care <g>. Thanks. efg ______________________________________________ R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html