On 9/5/05, Göran Broström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 01:55:39PM -0400, Peter Flom wrote: > > Goran wrote > > <<< > > The consensus (so far) seems to be to stick to MikTeX and skip proTeXt. > > Thanks for all the input. > > >>> > > > > Well, nothing against MikTeX, but ProteXt also works fine with R. > > I have made some studying; it seems as if proTeXt is nothing but MikTeX > together with WinEdt or TeXnicsCenter and ghostscript/ghostview, so the > choice is really between WinEdt and (X)Emacs; you get MikTeX in both cases.
In that case it probably uses the same registry entries in which case the batch utilities I mentioned would likely work with it without any change. ______________________________________________ R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
