Thanks Ales,
Best wishes 
Stephen.

________________________________

From: Ales Ziberna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 25/11/2005 10:05
To: Stephen; r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [R] Survreg Weibull lambda and p


Yes, that is correct!
 
Best,
Ales Ziberna

        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Stephen <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
        To: Ales Ziberna <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  ;
r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch 
        Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 4:17 PM
        Subject: RE: [R] Survreg Weibull lambda and p

        Hi Ales,
        Sorry Mis-read your posting - I blindly saw 'no effect' and was
thrown 
        - so its like a dummy regression you loose 1 category 
        I can conclude that p of randgrp is 1.47e-04 or 0.000147 which
is a significant difference between the groups?
        Sorry this is the first time I have  done this.
        Thanks
        S

________________________________

        From: Ales Ziberna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Sent: Thu 24/11/2005 14:12
        To: Stephen; r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch
        Subject: Re: [R] Survreg Weibull lambda and p
        
        

        Firstly, I assume that your variable is a numeric one. For
seperat values p
        and lambda for diferent categories, you should convert it to
factor.
        
        However, this has no effect in your case, since you have only 2
categories.
        You can have only one p and lambda for a variable with only 2
values. The
        model can only evaluate the diference, which is what you got,
assuming that
        your groups are coded in such a way, that the difference between
the codes
        is 1.
        
        Best,
        Ales Ziberna
        
        
        
        ----- Original Message -----
        From: "Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        To: <r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch>
        Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 10:13 AM
        Subject: [R] Survreg Weibull lambda and p
        
        
        > Hi All,
        >
        >
        >
        > I have conducted the following survival analysis which appears
to be OK
        >
        > (thanks BRipley for solving my earlier problem).
        >
        >
        >
        >> surv.mod1 <- survreg( Surv(timep1, relall6)~randgrpc,
data=Dataset,
        > dist="weibull", scale = 1)
        >
        >> summary(surv.mod1)
        >
        >
        >
        > Call:
        >
        > survreg(formula = Surv(timep1, relall6) ~ randgrpc, data =
Dataset,
        >
        >    dist = "weibull", scale = 1)
        >
        >            Value Std. Error     z         p
        >
        > (Intercept)  7.36      0.259 28.42 1.27e-177
        >
        > randgrpc    -0.59      0.156 -3.80  1.47e-04
        >
        >
        >
        > Scale fixed at 1
        >
        >
        >
        > Weibull distribution
        >
        > Loglik(model)= -1268.6   Loglik(intercept only)= -1276
        >
        >        Chisq= 14.72 on 1 degrees of freedom, p= 0.00012
        >
        > Number of Newton-Raphson Iterations: 5
        >
        > n= 400
        >
        >
        >
        >> version
        >
        >         _
        >
        > platform i386-pc-mingw32
        >
        > arch     i386
        >
        > os       mingw32
        >
        > system   i386, mingw32
        >
        > status
        >
        > major    2
        >
        > minor    1.1
        >
        > year     2005
        >
        > month    06
        >
        > day      20
        >
        > language R
        >
        >>
        >
        > I emailed this output to a colleague and received an email
requesting
        > for the 2 groups (randgrpc in the code)
        >
        > the 'Weibull lambda and p values' in the analysis. I checked
the
        > mailings for direction but to no avail.
        >
        > Could someone please provide direction as how to extract the
Weibull
        > "lambda" and "p" for both randgrpc values?
        >
        > Many thanks
        >
        > S.
        >
        >
        > ???? ?"? ???? ????
        > http://mail.nana.co.il
        >
        > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
        >
        > ______________________________________________
        > R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
        > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
        > PLEASE do read the posting guide!
        > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
        
        


        ???? ?"? ???? ????
        http://mail.nana.co.il


???? ?"? ???? ????
http://mail.nana.co.il

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html

Reply via email to