Robin Hankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 17 Nov 2006, at 14:14, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > > [snip] > > > > > so a+b+c is really (a+b)+c and I was calculating a+(b+c). That's > > actually a little bit harder because you don't get help from argument > > matching: > > > > "++" <- function(...) if ((n <- nargs()) == 1) ..1 else { > > l <- list(...) > > do.call("++",l[-n]) + l[[n]] > > } > > > > > Aha, the dreaded "..1" argument. Where do I look for documentation > on this? > > [It is mentioned twice in The R Language Definition, but I'm no wiser]
It's just the first of the ... arguments, essentially list(...)[[1]], except for lazy evaluation details. The second one is ..2, and so forth. -- O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Ă˜ster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~~~~~~~~~ - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) FAX: (+45) 35327907 ______________________________________________ R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.