Robin Hankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On 17 Nov 2006, at 14:14, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> >
> > so a+b+c is really (a+b)+c and I was calculating a+(b+c). That's
> > actually a little bit harder because you don't get help from argument
> > matching:
> >
> > "++" <- function(...) if ((n <- nargs()) == 1) ..1 else {
> >     l <- list(...)
> >     do.call("++",l[-n]) + l[[n]]
> > }
> >
> 
> 
> Aha, the dreaded "..1" argument.   Where do I look for documentation
> on this?
> 
> [It is mentioned twice in The R Language Definition, but I'm no wiser]

It's just the first of the ... arguments, essentially list(...)[[1]],
except for lazy evaluation details. The second one is ..2, and
so forth. 

-- 
   O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Ă˜ster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark          Ph:  (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - ([EMAIL PROTECTED])                  FAX: (+45) 35327907

______________________________________________
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to