obviously not. any other suggestion? of course, it would be even better if someone who knew what he is doing were to add this functionality on demand (e.g., optional parameters) to the standard lm classes. just a thought...
On 1/1/07, Michael Kubovy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 1, 2007, at 9:00 PM, ivo welch wrote: > > > I have written a short lme.R function, which adds normalized > > coefficients and White heteroskedasticity-adjusted statistics to the > > standard output. Otherwise, it behaves like lm. > > Is it a good idea to call it lme, since there's a widely used lme() > in the nlme package? > _____________________________ > Professor Michael Kubovy > University of Virginia > Department of Psychology > USPS: P.O.Box 400400 Charlottesville, VA 22904-4400 > Parcels: Room 102 Gilmer Hall > McCormick Road Charlottesville, VA 22903 > Office: B011 +1-434-982-4729 > Lab: B019 +1-434-982-4751 > Fax: +1-434-982-4766 > WWW: http://www.people.virginia.edu/~mk9y/ > > > ______________________________________________ R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
