Dears members of R list,
I have a technical question about conducting 2 way analysis of the variance 
(ANOVA) for repeated measures followed tukey test using R.
my data are: 
There were 3 subj in all and 3 repeated measures for every time and therapy
therapy = a,b,c
time    = t1,t2,t3
subj    = 1,2,3

subj    therapy t0      t1      t2
1       a       80.5    82.2    54.23
2       a       84.9    85.6    56.83
3       a       81.5    81.4    54.30
1       b       83.8    95.2    59.67
2       b       83.3    94.3    59.20
3       b       86      91.5    59.17
1       c       80.7    80.2    53.63
2       c       89.4    80.1    56.50
3       c       91.8    86.4    59.40

the code that I use is:

rm(list=ls(all=TRUE))
dati<- read.table("dati.txt", T)
attach(dati)
subj<- c( 1: 9, 1: 9,1:9)
therapy<- factor( c( rep(" a", 3), rep(" b", 3), rep(" c", 3),
                     rep(" a", 3), rep(" b", 3), rep(" c", 3),
                     rep(" a",3), rep(" b", 3), rep(" c", 3)))

time<- factor( c( rep(" t0", 9), rep(" t1", 9),rep(" t2", 9)))
weight<- c( t0,t1,t2)

time <- factor( time)
therapy <- factor( therapy)
subj <- factor( subj)
summary( fm1<-aov( weight~time*therapy))
fm1Tukey=TukeyHSD(fm1,"therapy",ordered = TRUE) ; fm1Tukey
fm1Tukey=TukeyHSD(fm1,"time",ordered = TRUE) ; fm1Tukey
fm1Tukey=TukeyHSD(fm1,"time:therapy",ordered = TRUE) ; fm1Tukey

My question is - is that the correct way to do it?? 
Very much obliged for your kind response
Maurizio

******************************************************************************
Maurizio Sarti, PhD
IREA - CNR
via Diocleziano,328 I-80124 Napoli (Italy)
tel:+39-(0)81-5707999-(0)81-5704945  fax:+39-(0)81-5705734  
cell:+39-3204397891
******************************************************************************
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] website: http://www.irea.cnr.it

______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to