On 2007-May-31 , at 18:56 , Bert Gunter wrote:
While Ravi's suggestion of the "compositions" package is certainly
appropriate, I suspect that the complex and extensive statistical
"homework"
you would need to do to use it might be overwhelming (the geometry of
compositions is a simplex, and this makes things hard).
Yes I am reading the documentation now, which is well written but
huge indeed...
As a simple and
perhaps useful alternative, use pairs() or splom() to plot your 5-D
data,
distinguishing the different treatments via color and/or symbol.
In addition, it might be useful to do the same sort of plot on the
first two
principal components (?prcomp) of the first 4 dimensions of your 5
component
vectors (since the 5th is determined by the first 4). Because of the
simplicial geometry, this PCA approach is not right, but it may
nevertheless
be revealing. The same plotting ideas are in the compositions
package done
properly (in the correct geometry),so if you are motivated to do
so, you can
do these things there. Even if you don't dig into the details,
using the
compositions package version of the plots may be realtively easy to
do,interpretable, and revealing -- more so than my "simple but wrong"
suggestions. You can decide.
I would not trust inference using ad hoc approaches in the
untransformed
data. That's what the package is for. But plotting the data should
always be
at least the first thing you do anyway. I often find it to be
sufficient,
too.
Thank you for your suggestions on plotting, I will look into it. I
was using histograms of mean proportions + SE until now because it
was what seemed the most straightforward given my specific questions.
If we come back to my original data (abandoning the statistical
language for a while ;) ) I have proportions of fishes caught 1. near
the surface, 2. a bit below, .... 5. near the bottom. The questions I
want to ask are for example: does the vertical distribution of
species A and species B differ? So I can plot the mean proportion at
each depth for both species and obtain a visual representation of the
vertical distribution of each.
At this stage differences between fishes that accumulate near the
surface or near the bottom are quite obvious. If I add error bars I
can get an idea of the variability of those distributions. The issue
arise when I want to *test* for a difference between the
distributions of species A and B. If I use a basic KS test I can only
compare the mean proportions for species A (5 points) to the mean
proportions of species B (5 points) and this has low power + does not
take in account the variability around those means. In addition I may
also want to know wether there is a difference within species A, B
and C and pairwise KS tests would increase alpha error risk. Am I
explaining things correctly? Does this seem logical to you too?
As for the PCA I must admit I don't really understand what you mean.
Thank you very much again.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jiho
Subject: Re: [R] Comparing multiple distributions
Nobody answered my first request. I am sorry if I did not explain my
problem clearly. English is not my native language and statistical
english is even more difficult. I'll try to summarize my issue in
more appropriate statistical terms:
Each of my observations is not a single number but a vector of 5
proportions (which add up to 1 for each observation). I want to
compare the "shape" of those vectors between two treatments (i.e. how
the quantities are distributed between the 5 values in treatment A
with respect to treatment B).
I was pointed to Hotelling T-squared. Does it seem appropriate? Are
there other possibilities (I read many discussions about hotelling
vs. manova but I could not see how any of those related to my
particular case)?
Thank you very much in advance for your insights. See below for my
earlier, more detailed, e-mail.
On 2007-May-21 , at 19:26 , jiho wrote:
I am studying the vertical distribution of plankton and want to
study its variations relatively to several factors (time of day,
species, water column structure etc.). So my data is special in
that, at each sampling site (each observation), I don't have *one*
number, I have *several* numbers (abundance of organisms in each
depth bin, I sample 5 depth bins) which describe a vertical
distribution.
Then let say I want to compare speciesA with speciesB, I would end
up trying to compare a group of several distributions with another
group of several distributions (where a "distribution" is a vector
of 5 numbers: an abundance for each depth bin). Does anyone know
how I could do this (with R obviously ;) )?
Currently I kind of get around the problem and:
- compute mean abundance per depth bin within each group and
compare the two mean distributions with a ks.test but this
obviously diminishes the power of the test (I only compare 5*2
"observations")
- restrict the information at each sampling site to the mean depth
weighted by the abundance of the species of interest. This way I
have one observation per station but I reduce the information to
the mean depths while the actual repartition is important also.
I know this is probably not directly R related but I have already
searched around for solutions and solicited my local statistics
expert... to no avail. So I hope that the stats' experts on this
list will help me.
Thank you very much in advance.
JiHO
---
http://jo.irisson.free.fr/
--
Ce message a été vérifié par MailScanner
pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de
suspect n'a été trouvé.
CRI UPVD http://www.univ-perp.fr
______________________________________________
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
