Sorry, my mistake. I should really leave looking at the help list until AFTER my morning coffee :P
On 26-Jun-07, at 11:31 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 6/26/2007 10:20 AM, Mike Lawrence wrote: >> According to the description of floor(), the latter result is the >> correct one: >> >> 'floor takes a single numeric argument x and returns a numeric vector >> containing the largest integers *not greater than* the corresponding >> elements of x.' (emphasis added) >> >> floor(3) == 2 >>> True > > 3 is not greater than 3, but it is greater than 2, so the result you > quote above is wrong. You should see > >> floor(3) > [1] 3 > >> floor(3) == 2 > [1] FALSE > > Do you really see the result you posted? > > Duncan Murdoch > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting- > guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. -- Mike Lawrence Graduate Student, Department of Psychology, Dalhousie University Website: http://memetic.ca Public calendar: http://icalx.com/public/informavore/Public "The road to wisdom? Well, it's plain and simple to express: Err and err and err again, but less and less and less." - Piet Hein ______________________________________________ R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.