Hi Hadley, thank you for providing this "scagnostics" primer.... I was trying to do some basic testing, and I see that I probably missed some points : first it's not clear for me if the argument of "scagnostics" should be raw data or "processed" data (results of calling "splom" or whatever...). If the first, I thought (from Wilkinson & al.) that if taking as an example variables x and y being the coordinates of a circle, I should find in scagnostics(x,y)$s : Skinny = 0 and Convex =1. I get Skinny = 1 and Convex =0.... What am I missing ? (My God, I'm feeling myself going to be "Ripleyed" !.....) Regards, Olivier
-- Olivier ETERRADOSSI Maître-Assistant CMGD / Equipe "Propriétés Psycho-Sensorielles des Matériaux" Ecole des Mines d'Alès Hélioparc, 2 av. P. Angot, F-64053 PAU CEDEX 9 tel std: +33 (0)5.59.30.54.25 tel direct: +33 (0)5.59.30.90.35 fax: +33 (0)5.59.30.63.68 http://www.ema.fr ______________________________________________ R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.