Yes. After I increase the threshould to 10000 it got through. Thanks a lot!
From: Uwe Ligges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: zhihua li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [R] Error: evaluation nested too deeply when doing heatmap
with binary distfunction
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:18:29 +0200
zhihua li wrote:
Hi netters,
I have a matrix X of the size (1000,100). The values are from -3 to
+3. When I tried
heatmap(X,
distfun=function(c),dist(c,method="bin"),hclustfun=function(m),hclust(m,method="average"))
I got the error message: Error: evaluation nested too deeply:
infinite recursion / options(expressions=)?
So, does it help to increase the thresholds?
If not, please specify a easily reproducible example that helps us
to investigate your problem.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
However, if I used default parameters for distfunction:
heatmap(X, hclustfun=function(m),hclust(m,method="average"))
there is no error messages at all.
But the problem is that I have to use binary method in my
disfunction. How can I resolve the problem?
Thanks a lot!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
______________________________________________
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
_________________________________________________________________
享用世界上最大的电子邮件系统― MSN Hotmail。 http://www.hotmail.com
______________________________________________
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
