I could not agree more with Göran and we had to change code in our packages because if this too. I also see students often facing bugs because of it. Again, with all the respect I have for Hadley.
On 26 Sep 2017 9:32 a.m., "Göran Broström" <goran.brost...@umu.se> wrote: I am beginning to get complaints from users of my CRAN packages (especially 'eha') to the effect that they get error messages like "Error: Unsupported use of matrix or array for column indexing". It turns out that they are sticking in tibbles into functions that expect data frames as input. And I am using the kind of subsetting that Hadley dislikes (eha is an old package, much older than tibbles). It is of course a simple matter to change the code so it handles both data frames and tibbles correctly, but this affects many functions, and it will take some time. And when the next guy introduces 'troubles' as an improvement of 'tibbles', I will have to rewrite the code again. While I like Hadley's way of doing it, I think it is a mistake to let a tibble also be of class data frame. To me it is a matter of inheritance and backwards compability: A tibble should add nice things to a data frame, not change basic behaviour, in order to call itself a data frame. Is it correct to let a tibble be of class "data.frame"? Göran Broström ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
