A github search might be helpful to identify packages that define macros in
their Rd files:
https://github.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=user%3Acran+extension%3Ard+newcommand&type=Code

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Rolf Turner <r.tur...@auckland.ac.nz> wrote:

>
> On 10/11/17 12:00, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> [Rolf Turner wrote:]
>
>>  ...  when I do the "R CMD
>>
>>> build" thing, when it comes to the "* building the PDF package manual"
>>> step it says "Hmm ... looks like a package" (no shit, Sherlock!) and
>>> emits a huge amount of verbose LaTeX diagnostics.
>>>
>>> "Normally" one just gets the line "* building the PDF package manual"
>>> and nothing else, and "R CMD build" just carries on cruising.
>>>
>>> Evidently defining a macro in the *.Rd file triggers the extra
>>> elaboration.
>>>
>>> It's no big deal of course, but I just thought I'd ask:
>>>
>>> (a) Is there anything to worry about in this respect?
>>>
>>
>> Of course, never ignore diagnostics.  Worry about every line that was
>> printed!
>>
>>
>>> (b) Is there anything different that I should be doing?
>>>
>>
>> Sounds like it...
>>
>>>
>>> (c) Is there anyway of suppressing the (ever-so-slightly annoying)
>>> extra screen output?
>>>
>>
>> Oooh, that's such a bad idea.  Don't do that.  Fix the problem that led
>> to the output.
>>
>
> Trouble is, I don't (a) know if this really *is* a problem, or (b) if it
> is, any idea of how to work out how to fix it.
>
> I would like to know if it is "an expected phenomenon".  Does it happen to
> other people?  I.e. is there anyone out there who has defined their
> own macro in a *.Rd file, and if so, do *they* get a plethora of LaTeX
> messages when they do "R CMD build" to the package in question?
>
> I'd love to hear from you! :-)
>
> cheers,
>
> Rolf
>
> --
> Technical Editor ANZJS
> Department of Statistics
> University of Auckland
> Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Reply via email to