On 2019-08-31 18:47, Göran Broström wrote:
I'm having difficulties updating my package eha: When I run standard checks 'at home' everything is fine, but 'CRAN-submissions' reports (among other things):

geomsup.f:324:9: warning: type of ‘dgemv’ does not match original declaration [-Wlto-type-mismatch]
   324 |      &     one, score, ione)
       |         ^
/home/tmp/R-d-gcc-LTO/include/R_ext/BLAS.h:107:1: note: type mismatch in parameter 12
   107 | F77_NAME(dgemv)(const char *trans, const int *m, const int *n,
       | ^

This is odd since the LAPACK subroutine dgemv takes only 11 parameters. However, in include/R_ext/BLAS.h we have

F77_NAME(dgemv)(const char *trans, const int *m, const int *n,
         const double *alpha, const double *a, const int *lda,
         const double *x, const int *incx, const double *beta,
         double *y, const int *incy FCLEN);

with a 12th parameter FCLEN?? How am I supposed to fix this, and what the ... is FCLEN? googling leads to nothing useful (for me). It seems as if R is redefining some standard LAPACK routines.

Also a note I do not understand (in this context):

note: type ‘void’ should match type ‘long int’

Any help is much appreciated.

Best, Göran

PS. How can I trigger these Warnings 'at home'?

See https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/LTO/README.txt (thanks to Uwe Ligges).

Another relevant document seems to be (2019-05-15):

https://developer.r-project.org/Blog/public/2019/05/15/gfortran-issues-with-lapack/index.html

First sentence:
"Recent version of the GNU Fortran compiler (7, 8, 9) include optimizations that break interoperability between C and Fortran code with BLAS/LAPACK."

And later:
"For the time being, everyone should use -fno-optimize-sibling-calls with GFortran version 7 and newer."

G,

______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Reply via email to