Dear Duncan, Duncan Murdoch wrote on 2019-10-24 21:51:
So it seems clear what to do: remove the BuildVignettes: false statement, and explain why CRAN should avoid building them in your submission message. This will likely make it take longer for the package to be handled; if that's a problem for you, you probably need to simplify the examples (or remove them).
THX, I got the idea. However, if we remove BuildVignettes: false, in the tarball the HTML5 vignettes in inst/doc are overwritten with pandoc's XHTML1.0 (with a warning, of course). That's the opposite of what we want.
The vignettes contain code for simulations which causes the long runtime. In examples of the man-pages we have -- much simpler ones -- in \donttest{}. I think that one of the purposes of vignettes is to give the user a more exhaustive description what can be done with certain functions. The only way out would to have instead of the R-code plain text. Runtimes close to zero but all -- rather useful -- formats lost.
We will try to keep them and start a discussion with the team. Helmut -- Ing. Helmut Schütz BEBAC – Consultancy Services for Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Studies Neubaugasse 36/11 1070 Vienna, Austria W https://bebac.at/ F https://forum.bebac.at/ ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
