Yesterday the publication of the new brinton package war archived (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/brinton/index.html) because the following line produces the following error:
if(rmarkdown::pandoc_available() == FALSE | rmarkdown::pandoc_version() < "1.12.3") {stop("'brinton' requires Pandoc v < 1.12.3 (https://pandoc.org/)")} Error in if (rmarkdown::pandoc_available() == FALSE | rmarkdown::pandoc_version() <: argument is of length zero The checks of the knitr package produce similar errors (https://cran.r-hub.io/web/checks/check_results_knitr.html) but knitr is available in CRAN (furtunatelly). Also, I have been punished by prof. Brian Ripley so I can not resubmit the package until January. Do you have any clue about how to fix this? Does to punish rookies have sense in this case? Thanks in advance, -Pere Millán On 10/11/2019 11:31, Pere Millan Martinez wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to submit a first version of the brinton package but the > CRAN-pretest on Debian produces the following NOTE: > > Check: for detritus in the temp directory, Result: NOTE > Found the following files/directories : > ‘calibre_4.2.0_tmp_BPGKxL’ ‘calibre_4.2.0_tmp_D8BXMj’ > ‘calibre_4.2.0_tmp_M8RU75’ ‘calibre_4.2.0_tmp_TipWj0’ > ‘calibre_4.2.0_tmp_f0mVQS’ ‘calibre_4.2.0_tmp_fHEPce’ > ‘runtime-hornik’ > > The 'brinton' package stores files in the temporary folder (which I > think is ok) but I can not figure out > the relationship between the files that are stored with > 'calibre_4.2.0'. Is this note a false positive or this > is something that I should fix prior to submit? > > Thank you, > Pere Millán-Martínez [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel