On 01.03.2020 00:12, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 1/03/20 11:44 am, Max Kuhn wrote:
On February 29, 2020 at 5:06:35 PM, Rolf Turner
(r.tur...@auckland.ac.nz <mailto:r.tur...@auckland.ac.nz>) wrote:
On 1/03/20 2:23 am, Hadley Wickham wrote:
> Is it down again? I'm seeing the same problem again.
> Hadley
>
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 2:41 PM Hadley Wickham <h.wick...@gmail.com
<mailto:h.wick...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Is win-builder down? I submitted a couple of packages >24 hours ago,
>> and haven't heard back.
>>
>> Hadley
Me too. Submitted a package about 18 hours ago, and so far not a
sausage. Although it's churlish to complain, one gets used to a service
that has been provided and gets annoyed when the service disappears.
True, but it would be unnecessary if `R CMD check —as-cran` did
exactly the same thing as win-builder (as well as the extra, informal
checks done on a first submission).
Not entirely true. The package that I am currently trying to get built
is for use by some consulting clients and is not (yet) for public
release. So I can't/don't submit it to CRAN so as to get a Windoze
binary that way.
cheers,
Rolf
P.S. I note that the winbuilder web site says:
Please do not upload Bioconductor packages or CRAN packages.
Both Bioconductor and CRAN do have build systems ....
I presume that this exhortation is of some antiquity and is "no longer
operative".
Indeed, as people also use winbuilder for the check results these days,
I will remove that sentence.
The queues were stuck due to some processes that the watchdog was not
able to kill entirely. Now oen and rnnign again.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
