On 13.09.2020 21:22, David Kepplinger wrote:
Dear List-Members:
The email from the automatic incoming checks says to "reply-all" in case
one suspects a false-positive, yet the reply-to header is set only to "
cran-submissi...@r-project.org". My email program (just as myself)
interprets this as "reply-all means replying only to
cran-submissi...@r-project.org". The wording in the email, on the other
hand, suggests I also should reply to Uwe Ligges. I find the current
disagreement of wording and email headers more than confusing.
Can someone clarify the correct protocol of replying to the email? I
wouldn't want to unnecessarily bother Uwe Ligges with even more emails.
Thanks: Uwe has configured mails in a way he always receives one mail in
a CRAN-submissions folder for both cases.
Best,
Uwe
Thanks,
David
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
