I think they are this:
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
...
and this:
* checking examples ... [76s/77s] NOTE
Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 5s
user system elapsed
ordPens-package 54.112 0.044 54.158
ordPCA 18.377 0.004 18.382
G.
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 3:38 PM Aisouda Hoshiyar
<aisouda.hoshi...@hsu-hh.de> wrote:
>
> The CRAN (pretest) email states:
>
> package ordPens_1.0.0.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks automatically,
> please see the following pre-tests:
> Debian:
> <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/00check.log
>
> <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/00check.log>>
> Status: 2 NOTEs
>
> Last released version's CRAN status: NOTE: 13
> See: <https://CRAN.R-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html
> <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html>>
>
> Please fix all problems and resubmit a fixed version via the webform.
> If you are fairly certain the rejection is a false positive, please reply-all
> to this message and explain.
>
> I really don’t understand how else to fix (and what to fix). These are out of
> date problems of version 0.3-1, which are not relevant any more in version
> 1.0.0
> Version 1.0.0 exactly was a fix to those.
>
> Do you think I can reply-all & explain that this must be a false-positive?
>
> Best
> Aisouda
>
>
>
> > Am 17.08.2021 um 15:22 schrieb Georgi Boshnakov
> > <georgi.boshna...@manchester.ac.uk>:
> >
> > When the previous version has problems, you get an email listing them,
> > followed with something like 'Did you fix them? Please Reply-All...'
> >
> > Maybe you missed the last phrase?
> >
> > Georgi Boshnakov
> >
> >
> >
> > Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> > From: R-package-devel <r-package-devel-boun...@r-project.org> on behalf of
> > Aisouda Hoshiyar <aisouda.hoshi...@hsu-hh.de>
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 12:59:13 PM
> > To: r-package-devel@r-project.org <r-package-devel@r-project.org>
> > Subject: [R-pkg-devel] submitting package update failed, since old version
> > out of date (?)
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > submitting an update of our package ordPens failed (update version is
> > 1.0.0), reporting the following:
> > Version: 1.0.0
> > ok
> > Version: 0.3-1
> > Check: R code for possible problems, Result: NOTE
> > genRidge: no visible global function definition for 'plogis'
> > ordGene: no visible global function definition for 'anova'
> > ordGene: no visible global function definition for 'lm'
> > ordSelect: no visible binding for global variable 'sd'
> > ordSmooth: no visible binding for global variable 'sd'
> > plot.ordPen: no visible global function definition for 'grey'
> > plot.ordPen: no visible global function definition for 'devAskNewPage'
> > plot.ordPen: no visible global function definition for 'lines'
> > predict.ordPen: no visible global function definition for 'plogis'
> > Undefined global functions or variables:
> > anova devAskNewPage grey lines lm plogis sd
> > Consider adding
> > importFrom("grDevices", "devAskNewPage", "grey")
> > importFrom("graphics", "lines")
> > importFrom("stats", "anova", "lm", "plogis", "sd")
> > to your NAMESPACE file.
> > Version: 0.3-1
> > Check: package dependencies, Result: NOTE
> > Package suggested but not available for checking: ‘IsoGene’
> > https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html
> > <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html>
> > <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html
> > <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html>>
> >
> > https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/
> >
> > <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/>
> >
> > <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/
> >
> > <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/>>
> >
> > But these are exactly the new changes that we already took care of in the
> > updated version 1.0.0
> > The previous version 0.3-1 is from 2015 and due to R updates, the old
> > package won’t work any more.
> > That is exactly the reason for update version 1.0.0, were everything is
> > fixed now.
> >
> > Also,
> > - there is a NOTE about change in maintainer, which is already stated in
> > the cran-comments.md, and the previous maintainer sent an e-main to CRAN as
> > well
> > - there is a NOTE saying 'Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time
> > > 10s‘
> > which is also stated in the cran-comments.md explaining that
> > cross-validation examples are important for illustrating the package usage.
> >
> >
> > So is this a false positive?
> >
> > Best
> > Aisouda
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
> > <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>
>
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
