В Sat, 5 Aug 2023 12:26:20 -0400 <b...@denney.ws> пишет: > I think that the error is coming from > the Codoc check in R CMD check not escaping the backslash before > ldots. Is my diagnosis correct? If so, what is the best way to > report this as a bug in R CMD check?
> Mismatches in argument default values: > > Name: 'subsequent_page_notification' Code: "\\ldots continued" > Docs: "\... continued" I think you're right. You can see the code doing the string substitution in tools:::.parse_usage_as_much_as_possible. Unfortunately, expressing "replace \whatever but only if the backslash is not escaped" using regular expressions is hard; for example, \\\whatever ought to be interpreted as an escaped backslash followed by a non-escaped \whatever, and so on. A negative look-behind assertion wouldn't do the right thing in this case. Send an e-mail to r-de...@r-project.org to discuss a potential solution, but be ready to file a problem report on R Bugzilla in order to make sure that it's not forgotten (which takes more steps but may be "more right"). See https://r-project.org/bugs.html for the official instructions. Meanwhile, I can suggest omitting the "\\ldots continued" default value from the Rd file as a workaround. WRE is not explicit about this, but missing default argument values currently don't count against you during a codoc() check, which is useful if the actual expression used to compute the default value is unwieldy. -- Best regards, Ivan ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
