Ok, this makes sense! I saw that Rcpp was failing the checks too but I wasn't sure if I should resubmit or wait. Thanks!
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 1:17 PM Ivan Krylov <ikry...@disroot.org> wrote: > В Wed, 7 Feb 2024 08:40:44 -0600 > Marcin Jurek <marcinjurek1...@gmail.com> пишет: > > > Packages required but not available: 'Rcpp', 'FNN', > > 'RcppArmadillo' Packages suggested but not available for checking: > > 'fields', 'rmarkdown', 'testthat', 'maptools' > > One of the machines running the incoming checks was having problems. If > you followed the failing dependency chain by looking at the CRAN check > results of the packages described as "not available", you could > eventually find a package needing compilation (Rcpp or stringi or > something else), look at the installation log and see Make trying to > run commands that are completely wrong. > > It looked like the path to the compiler was empty: > > https://web.archive.org/web/20240208191430/https://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang/Rcpp-00install.html > > I think that the problems are solved now, so it should be safe to > increment the version and submit it again. > > -- > Best regards, > Ivan > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
