On 19 January 2017 at 02:49, Klint Gore wrote:
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Dirk Eddelbuettel [mailto:dirk.eddelbuet...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of 
Dirk Eddelbuettel
| > Sorry, what part of '14.04' is current?
| >
| > Ubuntu is at 16.10. And release 16.04, which as a LTS replaces the LTS 
14.04 you use, also passes.  Can you upgrade?
| 
| That version of the openblas package is the latest currently available for 
14.04 LTS from the official ubuntu repository.  14.04 LTS is "supported" by 
Canonical until 2019.  

Well but aren't you confusing or conflating two things here? I am only
harping on this as it is r-sig-debian. "Supported" by Canonical means that
should a security bug require an update to a component of your installation,
you may get it from their repo. No more, no less.

Otherwise, the focus is on _stability_ -- hence no changes whatsoever. [1] 

Which in turn means old, known bugs like the one we are talking about here
will NOT get fixed.  It is a trade-off: some people value the stability, some
people value the fixes and new features.  
 
| Also, I'm just confirming that I can repeat it.  It's not an issue for me as 
it's never happened other than the contrived example.  If someone brought it to 
my attention, I'd probably follow your original though and ask them if they 
really wanted the determinant of an unassigned matrix as it sounds like not a 
useful thing to do.  Using rnorm to initialise the matrix works fine.
| 
| I'd suggest the OP pursue it with the linux mint people as it's directly 
affecting him and it occurs in their "supported" version.

Agreed.

Dirk

[1] Eg the R version in 14.04 is forever fixed at version 3.0.2 as far as the
'official Ubuntu repository' is concerned. 
| 
| 

-- 
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

_______________________________________________
R-SIG-Debian mailing list
R-SIG-Debian@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-debian

Reply via email to