On 15 July 2020 at 16:13, Göran Broström wrote:
| On 2020-07-15 14:36, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > 
| > Göran,
| > 
| > This is not an easy email to reply to because it _contains nothing
| > reproducible_.
| 
| Thanks Dirk,
| 
| Sorry about that, but my real question was (see below): "Is the problem 
| that openblas uses C versions of blas?" That is, do I need to change
| 
| F77_CALL(name)(...);
| 
| to
| 
| cblas_name(...);
| 
| everywhere? And if so, is this really a good idea with old code?

I don't think so. At the end of the day it comes from "higher up" (say,
crossprod()) and is just passed down.

Remember, at the end it's all assembler :)

| I'll try to extract a reproducible example from the package (eha) where 
| I run it.

+1

Dirk

-- 
https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

_______________________________________________
R-SIG-Debian mailing list
R-SIG-Debian@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-debian

Reply via email to