On 15 July 2020 at 16:13, Göran Broström wrote: | On 2020-07-15 14:36, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > Göran, | > | > This is not an easy email to reply to because it _contains nothing | > reproducible_. | | Thanks Dirk, | | Sorry about that, but my real question was (see below): "Is the problem | that openblas uses C versions of blas?" That is, do I need to change | | F77_CALL(name)(...); | | to | | cblas_name(...); | | everywhere? And if so, is this really a good idea with old code?
I don't think so. At the end of the day it comes from "higher up" (say, crossprod()) and is just passed down. Remember, at the end it's all assembler :) | I'll try to extract a reproducible example from the package (eha) where | I run it. +1 Dirk -- https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org _______________________________________________ R-SIG-Debian mailing list R-SIG-Debian@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-debian
