Dear all, 

My apologies, the figure seems to have been removed from the mail! Hope this 
attachment makes it instead...

Steve


Dr Stephen  Thackeray
Lake Ecosystem Group
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology
Lancaster Environment Centre
Library Avenue
Bailrigg
Lancaster
LA1 4AP
[email protected]



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thackeray, Stephen J.
Sent: 08 February 2012 09:13
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: [R-sig-eco] Comparison of gam and gamm fits

Dear list members,

I apologise in advance for the large-ish email, but I thought it was important 
to paste in some plots for what follows.

I am using generalised additive models to capture patterns of seasonal and 
interannual variation in the abundance of zooplankton, in a lake ecosystem. I 
am trying to fit models with smoothers for year and day of year to capture the 
"average" pattern in each of these temporal dimensions, and then have added a 
two-dimensional (tensor product) smoother to try to model any changes in the 
seasonal pattern among years. I am mindful that I may need to deal with 
correlated errors in these models and so would like to fit error structures to 
see if they improve model fit, judged by AIC. Therefore, as a first step I 
re-fitted the gam model using gamm, to allow later inclusion of a correlation 
structure:

Daph_gam4<-gam((DAPHG+0.1)~s(Year,bs="cr")+s(DOY,bs="cr")+te(Year,DOY),family=Gamma(link="log"),data=ZooDat2)
Daph_gam4_no_ac<-gamm((DAPHG+0.1)~s(Year,bs="cr")+s(DOY,bs="cr")+te(Year,DOY),family=Gamma(link="log"),data=ZooDat2)

...where DAPHG is the abundance of a particular species of interest and DOY= 
day of year. I am using a Gamma distribution as the data are heavily skewed and 
on a continuous scale (numbers per litre lake water).

The problem I am having is that these two models produce dramatically different 
fits, see the image plots below. In this case the result of the gam model 
(Daph_gam4, labelled gam in the plot) bears a much greater resemblance to the 
original data. Could anyone help me to understand why these two model fits are 
so very different, when they are fitting the same smoothers?

Any help much appreciated!

Steve





Dr Stephen  Thackeray
Lake Ecosystem Group
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology
Lancaster Environment Centre
Library Avenue
Bailrigg
Lancaster
LA1 4AP
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>



--
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject 
to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any 
reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under 
the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records 
management system.
_______________________________________________
R-sig-ecology mailing list
[email protected]
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-ecology

Reply via email to