Hi!
I am running a (tb-)RDA with Hellinger transformed (species) abundance data. To 
interpret the response I use some criteria:
The axes which are worth to look at: broken stick method
The axes I want to look at: explained variance

Now comes the question: is there a criterion to decide which 
descriptors/species are worth to interpret? In PCA I would use the equilibrium 
circle. Can I use it in RDA?

Best wishes
Christoph

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

_______________________________________________
R-sig-ecology mailing list
[email protected]
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-ecology

Reply via email to