thanks tom: I've just been letting the error happen and everything seems
fine. When you have a chance, could you explain what you'd like me to do ?
I'd love to look into
it further but I'm not sure what you mean by your last statement. thanks.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Tom Callaway <tcall...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 12/24/2011 10:39 PM, Mark Leeds wrote:
> > Does anyone know what the problem might be ? Maybe a difference with gcc
> ?
> > It's only a warning but it scares me a little because the variables
> should
> > be getting used contrary to what the warning says.
> > Thanks a lot for any hints/suggestions.
>
> Well, I can't find the source code to be sure, but the gcc in F16 is
> newer than the ones before it, and each new gcc is usually stricter
> about std compliance than the one before. In addition, -std=gnu99 is
> being passed as an optflag, which may result in these warnings when they
> would not otherwise.
>
> I would look very closely at those variables and be sure there is not a
> logic path where they are set but not actually used.
>
> ~tom
>
> ==
> Fedora Project
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________
R-SIG-Fedora mailing list
R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
