Terry Griffin, Ph.D.
Associate Professor - Economics
University of Arkansas - Division of Agriculture
501.249.6360 (SMS)
tgrif...@uaex.edu
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Downey" <pdow...@urban.org>
To: "Roger Bivand" <roger.biv...@nhh.no>
Cc: r-sig-...@stat.math.ethz.ch
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2011 1:02:04 PM
Subject: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Simulating spatially autocorrelated data
Hi Roger and Terry,
Thank you very much for your help and directing me towards Roger's spdep
package, which of course had everything I needed. I've now worked through
this code and done some additional simulations.
I have one remaining question. You say "the larger the distance threshold,
the less well the spatial process is captured." I was wondering if you
could further provide some information on this, either by explaining or
referencing a document or webpage with explanation.
Decreasing the distance threshold, as you suggest, radically alters the
results and I'm looking for some guidance on how to select the appropriate
distance threshold when I don't know the true rho (that is, with
non-simulated data).
Thanks,
Mitch
-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Bivand [mailto:roger.biv...@nhh.no]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:20 PM
To: Downey, Patrick
Cc: r-sig-...@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Simulating spatially autocorrelated data
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, Downey, Patrick wrote:
Hello all,
I'm trying to simulate a spatially autocorrelated random variable, and
I cannot figure out what the problem is. All I want is a simple
spatial lag model where
Y = rho*W*Y + e
Where e is a vector of iid normal random variables, rho is the
autocorrelation, W is a row-normalized distance matrix (a spatial
weights matrix), and Y is the random variable.
I thought the following program should do it, but it's not working. At
the end of the program, I calculate Moran's I, and it is not even
close to rejecting the null hypothesis of no spatial autocorrelation,
even when rho is very high (for example, below, rho is 0.95). Can
someone please identify what the problem is and offer some guidance on
how to fix it?
PS - I apologize in advance, but I am not familiar with R's spatial
packages. I've done very little spatial analysis in R, so if there's a
package that can already do this, please recommend.
BEGIN PROGRAM:
install.packages("fields");library(fields)
install.packages("ape");library(ape)
N <- 200
rho <- 0.95
x.coord <- runif(N,0,100)
y.coord <- runif(N,0,100)
points <- cbind(x.coord,y.coord)
e <- rnorm(N,0,1)
dist.nonnorm <- rdist(points,points) # Matrix of Euclidean distances
dist <- dist.nonnorm/rowSums(dist.nonnorm) # Row normalizing the
distance
matrix
diag(dist) <- 0 # Ensuring that the main diagonal is exactly 0
I think that you are using the distances as weights, not inverse distances,
which seems more sensible.
I <- diag(N) # Identity matrix (not Moran's I)
inv <- solve(I-rho.lag*dist) # Inverting (I - rho*W)
y <- as.vector(inv %*% e) # Generating data that is supposed to be
spatially autocorrelated
Moran.I(y,dist) # Does not reject null hypothesis of no spatial
autocorrelation
As Terry Griffin says, you can use spdep for this:
library(spdep)
rho <- 0.95
N <- 200
x.coord <- runif(N,0,100)
y.coord <- runif(N,0,100)
points <- cbind(x.coord,y.coord)
e <- rnorm(N,0,1)
dnb <- dnearneigh(points, 0, 150)
dsts <- nbdists(dnb, points)
idw <- lapply(dsts, function(x) 1/x)
lw <- nb2listw(dnb, glist=idw, style="W") inv <- invIrW(lw, rho) y <- inv
%*% e moran.test(y, lw)
to reproduce your analysis with IDW, here without:
lw <- nb2listw(dnb, glist=dsts, style="W") inv <- invIrW(lw, rho) y <- inv
%*% e moran.test(y, lw) # no autocorrelation
and here with a less inclusive distance threshold:
dnb <- dnearneigh(points, 0, 15)
dsts <- nbdists(dnb, points)
idw <- lapply(dsts, function(x) 1/x)
lw <- nb2listw(dnb, glist=idw, style="W") inv <- invIrW(lw, rho) y <- inv
%*% e moran.test(y, lw)
the larger the distance threshold, the less well the spatial process is
captured, alternatively use idw <- lapply(dsts, function(x) 1/(x^2)), for
example, to attenuate the weights more sharply.
Hope this clarifies,
Roger
_______________________________________________
R-sig-Geo mailing list
R-sig-Geo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
--
Roger Bivand
Department of Economics, NHH Norwegian School of Economics, Helleveien 30,
N-5045 Bergen, Norway.
voice: +47 55 95 93 55; fax +47 55 95 95 43
e-mail: roger.biv...@nhh.no
_______________________________________________
R-sig-Geo mailing list
R-sig-Geo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
