Dear Edzer, How do you conceive the future of the package `spacetime` and more generally, the representation of spatio-temporal data, in light of the transition from `sp` to `sf`?
For context, I'm working on a package that handles spatio-temporal point patterns. For my analyses I have relied on `sf` with some additional attribute for the dates. However, for packaging I think it is safer to rely on explicit classes for spatio-temporal data (so I don't have to worry all the time about which is the temporal variable, in which format, etc.). But it seems that only `spacetime` provides such classes generically, which in turn relies on `sp` for the spatial dimension. Is this going to continue to be supported or are there other plans? Thanks in advance ƒacu.- -- Facundo Muñoz *Biostatistician* Département de Systèmes Biologiques UMR ASTRE: Animal, Santé, Territoires, Risques et Écosystèmes Campus international de Baillarguet, TA A-117 / E (E-203) 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5 (France) +33(0) 467 593 868 @famuvie _______________________________________________ R-sig-Geo mailing list R-sig-Geo@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
