Its better than no package at all, right? I think this is a metadata issue. If packages were keyworded a la Gentoo, users could mask out packages that don't pass R package checks, etc. (Maybe that's already in place. I haven't tracked closely recent changes in R.)
THK On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 08:32 +0200, Martin Maechler wrote: > Hi Roger, > > I'm sorry, I didn't want to bash the "R-spatial" project at all. > I think it's great that you do lead and coordinate this > initiative, with such a high quality. > > I somewhat got carried away by the fact (more general) that > people "publish R packages" but are too lazy to make them pass R > CMD check. > BTW, I don't think a package needs to pass "R-devel CMD check" > to be accepted for CRAN. > > Regards, > and thanks once more to the initiatiors and maintainers of the > R-spatial projects! > > Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich > > _______________________________________________ > R-sig-Geo mailing list > R-sig-Geo@stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo _______________________________________________ R-sig-Geo mailing list R-sig-Geo@stat.math.ethz.ch https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo