john lewis wrote:
> Hello all,
> I did a comparison of gstat, geoR and SPlus 6.1 about 2 years ago with the 
> coal ash data and found little difference among them after a bit of time 
> making sure all input parameters were the same. I don't know if I can find 
> those results but maybe it is time for me to do it again?
>   
Maybe they're not worrying from a statistical point of view, but from 
the point of view of code verification I am interested to see them (with 
the data & scripts to generated them). The coalash data are only 
available in S-Plus, am I right? (We do have an S+SpatialStats licence, 
but never got around to set it up for 7.0)
--
Edzer

_______________________________________________
R-sig-Geo mailing list
R-sig-Geo@stat.math.ethz.ch
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo

Reply via email to