In that case, you could always try stacking the panels vertically instead of
horizontally? If this is even possible with the function you are using. Or
just plot each panel to an image and superimpose them using another method?
I've done things like that where I had R create PNG images and then call
some ImageMagick binaries to combine them.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Rubén Roa-Ureta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gledson Picharski wrote:
>
>> Hi RubÃ(c)n,
>>
>> Try this,
>>
>> my.func <- set.coords.lims #if you want this geoR function latter.
>> set.coords.lims <-function(coords)apply(coords,2,range) plot(z1)
>>
>> points(z1,pt.divide=c("data.proportional"),lambda=1,col="gray",yl="",xl="")
>>
>> ## to get set.coords.lims back.
>> set.coords.lims <- my.func
>> plot(z1)
>>
>>
>> ______________________
>> Gledson Luiz Pichasrki
>> PET EstatÃstica - UFPR
>> http://www.leg.ufpr.br/~gledson <http://www.leg.ufpr.br/%7Egledson>
>> http://www.leg.ufpr.br/pet
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Mensagem original ----
>> De: RubÃ(c)n Roa-Ureta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Para: r-sig-geo@stat.math.ethz.ch
>> Enviadas: Domingo, 19 de Outubro de 2008 21:11:48
>> Assunto: [R-sig-Geo] Problem with points.geodata and plot.geodata
>>
>> Hi ComRades,
>>
>> The functions points.geoadata and plot.geodata have an underisable
>> behavior with the limits of the X axis of the plot, as shown by the toy
>> example below. The range covered by the X axis is too wide. Setting specific
>> limits with xlim in, for example points.geoadata, doesn't solve the problem.
>> Does anybody knows of a solution or a way around this feature.
>> Thanks
>> RubÃ(c)n
>>
>> x <- runif(100,100,200)
>> y <- runif(length(x),1000,2000)
>> z <- rnorm(length(x),50,15)
>> a <- sample(c(1,2),length(x),replace=TRUE)
>> Q <- data.frame(cbind(x,y,z,a))
>> z1 <- subset(Q,a==1,select=c(x,y,z))
>> library(geoR)
>> #Loading required package: sp
>> #
>> #-------------------------------------------------------------
>> #Analysis of geostatistical data
>> #For an Introduction to geoR go to http://www.leg.ufpr.br/geoR
>> #geoR version 1.6-22 (built on 2008-10-08) is now loaded
>> #-------------------------------------------------------------
>> z1 <- as.geodata(z1)
>> plot(z1)
>>
>> points(z1,pt.divide=c("data.proportional"),lambda=1,col="gray",yl="",xl="")
>>
>>
> Thanks Gledson. Your fuction method works for plot.geodata and
> points.geodata. I also wanted to make it work with image.kriging but it
> doesn't.
> My general idea is that a good representation of model fit to data in the
> case of a geostatistical model is a two-panel plot showing the observation
> points on one panel (with size or color or both proportional to the
> magnitude of the spatial variable) and the spatial prediction by kriging
> with the fitted model on the other panel (like my Fig. 4 in ICES Journal of
> Marine Science 64:1723, 2007), but this presentation has problems when the
> spatial sample layout is elongated because it makes too much blank space,
> for the good reasons explained by Barry.
> Rubén
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-Geo mailing list
> R-sig-Geo@stat.math.ethz.ch
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________
R-sig-Geo mailing list
R-sig-Geo@stat.math.ethz.ch
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
