Faye Anderson wrote: > Hi All, > I think sgeostat function fit.variogram does it. > No, it does not quantify the correlations between variogram estimates, so you'd better forget about the "Generalized" -- just look at the output of variogram() that it reads; also the reweighting is only used when you ask for it; it's a rather problematic feature IMO, as you'd change the definition of the thing you optimize while you're optimizing it...
In your original question you forgot to mention that you meant IRWGLS for variogram model fitting. -- Edzer > Thanks. > Faye > > _______________________________________________ > R-sig-Geo mailing list > R-sig-Geo@stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo > -- Edzer Pebesma Institute for Geoinformatics (ifgi), University of Münster Weseler Straße 253, 48151 Münster, Germany. Phone: +49 251 8333081, Fax: +49 251 8339763 http://ifgi.uni-muenster.de/ http://www.springer.com/978-0-387-78170-9 e.pebe...@wwu.de _______________________________________________ R-sig-Geo mailing list R-sig-Geo@stat.math.ethz.ch https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo