-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dylan Beaudette ha scritto: [snip] > Hi. It is alway nice to see people working GRASS SoC projects, thank you! > > I would just add-- I think that all efforts to build onto existing > libraries would be a good thing. That is to say, try and work with > GRASS-R-gstat: this is by far one of the best implementations of > geostatistics available. Paul's automap would be another likely > candidate .
Hi Dylan, and sorry for late response, there are two packages that provide kriging in R, and the discussion in this thread leads to use one of them to avoid the differences in results coming from implementation differences. On your advice I'll choose gstat and automap, even if geoR looked very complete. Maybe I could offer the user the choice bteween the two packages, in a 2.x release of the plugin. This could allow R users keep using their preferred algorithms, what do you think? > The real problem with a single GRASS module for 'kriging' is that the > operation requires careful thought and familiarity with the data-- not > really something that can be easily generalized to the conceptual > basis of a single GRASS module. Perhaps asking Edzer about room for > user-interface improvements in the gstat code would yield some good > starting points. Good - I'll ask him soon. > Cheers, > Dylan cheers, Anne -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkoeSaQACgkQrgxAvFOwDdiYdQCeKVwmLg3D1DW4WTHAfficfN4b 7wcAn34f0lTzGrgstcWMJX5VqsKUh2ec =NmbT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ R-sig-Geo mailing list R-sig-Geo@stat.math.ethz.ch https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
