Dear Community,

I hope that my question is not misplaced here, but I do not know where (and 
whom) to ask other than here. My problem concerns methodical issues as well as 
the search for the right R function.

For a quite some time I work with spatial data and I was now asked to test my 
data for spatial autocorrelation. The more I read on that topic, the more 
uncertain I am if this kind of analyses is really made for my kind of data. I 
work on plots distributed over a study area of not more than 30 x 30 km. These 
plots are point data in the sense of point coordinates. Two locations are at 
least 4 km apart but not evenly distributed over the area. For these plots I 
have data on species richness and habitat. So far I did all my analyses using 
vector data sets (in the form of shape files) and never used raster data. So 
far I have often been told simply to use Moran's I for my analyses of spatial 
autocorrelation because everybody else is using it. And hey, never touch a 
running system so why should we use something different. But I am unaware if 
this kind of analysis really works with data that are not organised in grid 
cells (i.e. raster data). I mean, it works and I get values but a!
 re these values reliable, when I use point data with no information in 
between? My Moran's I correlograms follow a zig zack pattern in my trials.

I will probably never come to the level that I fully understand the underlying 
mathematics behind the latest statistical methods but I hope that I at least 
come to a level that enables me to judge what method should be used for a 
particular kind of data and/or problem. For many analyses it has been stated 
that they are mainly for the analysis of global data or should be applied on 
larger spatial scales. So which kind of analysis is best for my small spatial 
data set and how can I get meaningful results for my analysis of spatial 
autocorrelation with R? Should I use Moran's I or Geary C or something 
completely different? Is it necessary to transform my data into raster data or 
do the test also work with point data? How many neighbours should I choose? (I 
tried 2 and 4 so far)

Cheers,

Nils

_______________________________________________
R-sig-Geo mailing list
[email protected]
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo

Reply via email to