Write to the package maintainer or the author to ask about this. Kasper
On Mar 26, 2008, at 6:02 PM, Cameron Redsell-Montgomerie wrote: > I am currently writing a paper comparing various packages in > different programs, and how they handle GEE. I was wondering if you > could help me out a bit. > Beyond the options included in each package, I've noticed a variance > in the various estimates and standard errors for most working > correlation options between packages. The most is observed in > Unstructured, and none in independence obviously. From what I've been > able to gather the difference is coming from how the working > correlations are calculated. I'm betting it's coming from the > residuals being used. SAS for instance uses the Pearson Residuals. > I was wondering if you could tell me how geepack or gee calculates > correlation. > > Could you also include full citation for yourself so I can properly > cite you, > Thank you Very Much, > > Cameron Redsell-Montgomerie > MSc Statistics > University of Guelph > MACN rm:501 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > R-SIG-Mac mailing list > R-SIG-Mac@stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac _______________________________________________ R-SIG-Mac mailing list R-SIG-Mac@stat.math.ethz.ch https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac
