Thank you 5426s fail but 5455s work So with R-2.9-branch-leopard-universal.tar.gz from http://r.research.att.com/ And then sudo tar... And R.app from http://r.research.att.com/R-GUI-5455-2.9-leopard-Leopard64.dmg or 32 I seem to have 32 and 64 2.9.2, cool
My sessionInfo at startup on this MacBook is ... R version 2.9.2 Patched (2009-09-05 r49613) i386-apple-darwin9.8.0 locale: en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8 attached base packages: [1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base -- Loren Engrav, MD Professor and Chief, Plastic Surgery, 1977-2001 Associate Director, Burn Center, 1977-2001 Univ Washington Seattle > From: David Winsemius <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:28:51 -0400 > To: David Winsemius <[email protected]> > Cc: Loren Engrav <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [R-SIG-Mac] [R] 64-bit OSX binary for 2.9.2 > > > On Sep 14, 2009, at 7:08 PM, David Winsemius wrote: > >> >> On Sep 14, 2009, at 6:34 PM, Loren Engrav wrote: >> >> snipped >>> >>> 3-R.app available at http://r.research.att.com/ is 5426 but 5455 32 >>> and 64 >>> bit available at >>> http://r.research.att.com/R-GUI-5455-2.9-leopard-Leopard.dmg as per >>> 8/6/09 >>> r-sig-mac discussion so I put in 5455; but why 5426 here and 5455 >>> there? >> >> Can't help you there. I have the 2.9.0 GUI [R.app GUI 1.29 (5463) >> x86_64-apple-darwin9.7.0] running with the R 2.9.1 Patched and am >> not having noticeable difficulties. My guess is that the "right" way >> to do this would be to use 5426 with R 2.9.2 > > And my guess appears to be wrong. I installed the current R-2.9-branch- > leopard-universal.tar.gz using Lianglou's confrmation of my suggestion > that sudo might need to prefix the ta command. Also downloaded the Mac > OS X GUI rev. 5426 for R 2.1.xleopard-Leopard64.dmg file and dragged > the R.app file to another loaction, renamed it R64new,app, and dragged > it to the Applications folder. That GUI crashes while the old one > launches R just fine. My newly installed R says it is R version 2.9.1 > Patched (2009-07-04 r48897) but I seem to remember Urbanek saying that > is misleading and that it really is 2.9.2 >> >> Note to web page maintainer. The labels on the R-GUI's must be >> wrong, they say "R 2.1.x". Is that supposed to say R 2.9.x and 2.10.x? >> >>> >>> Thank you >>> >>> Loren Engrav, MD >>> U Washington > snipped > > David Winsemius, MD > Heritage Laboratories > West Hartford, CT > _______________________________________________ R-SIG-Mac mailing list [email protected] https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac
