Sorry mail was not finished.
> Not sure about that.
>
> This was only one tree out of 2500 bayesian trees, that I planned to
> use to take into account phylogenetic uncertainty.In my opinion that
> would also include branch length differences in the different trees
B.
Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:
> Von: Birgit Lemcke <birgit.lem...@systbot.uzh.ch>
> Datum: 26. Februar 2009 16:54:08 GMT+01:00
> An: Emmanuel Paradis <emmanuel.para...@mpl.ird.fr>
> Kopie: HelpPhyCompR <r-sig-phylo@r-project.org>
> Betreff: Re: [R-sig-phylo] Fwd: still problems using ace: data
> examples
>
> Not sure about that.
>
> This was only one tree out of 2500 bayesian trees, that I planned to
> use to take into account phylogenetic uncertainty.In my opinion that
> would also include
> Am 26.02.2009 um 16:29 schrieb Emmanuel Paradis:
>
>> Birgit Lemcke <birgit.lem...@systbot.uzh.ch> a écrit :
>>> Here is a data example to reproduce what I did
>>
>> It comes from the present tree: it fails to converge even using
>> random data. I suggest you do a transformation a branch lengths
>> using compute.brlen (hoping that it will make sense for your
>> problem).
>>
>> EP
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>>
>
> =============================
> Birgit Lemcke
> Institut of Systematic Botany
> University of Zurich
> Zollikerstrasse 107
> CH-8008 Zürich
> Switzerland
> Ph: +41 (0)44 634 8416
> mail: birgit.lem...@systbot.uzh.ch
> =============================
>
>
>
>
>
>
=============================
Birgit Lemcke
Institut of Systematic Botany
University of Zurich
Zollikerstrasse 107
CH-8008 Zürich
Switzerland
Ph: +41 (0)44 634 8416
mail: birgit.lem...@systbot.uzh.ch
=============================
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
