Hello everyone,
I am comparing a categorical data vs. a continues data, but the continues data is a frequency of an observed parameter. I'm considering using phylogenetic ANOVA (Garland 1993) or PGLS for categorical data. But, I am not sure with one is more appropriate to my data. I would like to ask if someone have any advice about the subject, or can recommend me a paper that compare these analyses. All the best - Carlos Bagolini-Jr -- Carlos Biagolini-Jr. Bacharel em Ci�ncias Biol�gicas - Universidade Federal de Lavras Mestrando em Diversidade Biol�gica e Conserva��o - Universidade Federal de S�o Carlos http://lattes.cnpq.br/4086237188108947 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________ R-sig-phylo mailing list - R-sig-phylo@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/r-sig-phylo@r-project.org/