On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Dave Henn <[email protected]> wrote:
> Maybe we should do away with copyright altogether and simply rely on > contracts alone. FWIW, that's not what I meant by my question. What I meant was, why is [new] statute required, given existing law? Would it not be sufficient to include clauses in new contracts that cover digital reading right? I realize that doesn't address the question of what to do with existing texts. Is that what you meant by statutory remedies being required? -- eric scoles ([email protected]) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "R-SPEC: The Rochester Speculative Literature Association" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/r-spec?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
