Actually, this could be a two-for for rogue states. If a rogue state can
figure out how to trigger massive volcanic eruptions, such as the Wyoming
Yellowstone Caldera's
impending-some-time-in-the-next-umpteeump-thousands-of-years explosion, then
they can have a major hit against a hated "enemy" while reducing the degree
of global warming.

David

On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Jonathan <[email protected]>wrote:

> This is the kind of thing I wish I'd thought of...
>
>
>
> Sent to you by Jonathan via Google Reader:
>
>
> Giant Explosions Are The Cheapest Way To Halt Climate Change, Say
> Scientists [Strange 
> Scenarios]<http://io9.com/5459922/giant-explosions-are-the-cheapest-way-to-halt-climate-change-say-scientists>
> via io9 <http://io9.com> by Annalee Newitz on 1/29/10
>
> A recent report from a group of environmental scientists, published in
> Nature, argues that cutting greenhouse emissions is much more expensive than
> another option we have to halt global warming: Setting of a mega-volcano
> that would coat atmosphere in nice, sun-blocking ash. According to an
> article on the report in the 
> *Telegraph*<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/7090608/Simulated-volcanic-eruptions-to-block-sun.html>:
>
>
> They called for governments to establish a multimillion-pound fund for
> research into the simulated volcanoes and other solar-radiation management
> techniques for shielding the Earth against sunlight.
>
> "The idea of deliberately manipulating Earth's energy balance to offset
> human-driven climate change strikes many as dangerous hubris," they wrote.
>
> "Many scientists have argued against research on solar radiation
> management, saying that developing the capability to perform such tasks will
> reduce the political will to lower greenhouse gas emissions. We think that
> the risks of not doing research outweigh the risks of doing it."
>
> They said the cost of solar radiation management was 100 times lower than
> the price tag for cutting emissions to achieve the same effect, raising the
> risk that small groups of nations or even rogue states could act alone.
>
> They wrote: "It is plausible that, after exhausting other avenues to limit
> climate risks, such a nation might decide to begin a gradual, well-monitored
> programme of deployment, even without any international agreement on its
> regulation.
>
> "In this case, one nation – which need not be a large and rich
> industrialised country – could seize the initiative on global climate,
> making it extremely difficult for other powers to restrain it."
>
>  So let me get this straight. "Rogue states" are going to get fed up with
> carbon taxes and instead create simulated volcanoes in order to save the
> environment? That's a . . . strange scenario. I like it though.
>
> <http://feeds.gawker.com/%7Eff/io9/full?a=7cGcakZwGGc:OQhtPBEyuv8:yIl2AUoC8zA>
> <http://feeds.gawker.com/%7Eff/io9/full?a=7cGcakZwGGc:OQhtPBEyuv8:D7DqB2pKExk>
> <http://feeds.gawker.com/%7Eff/io9/full?a=7cGcakZwGGc:OQhtPBEyuv8:V_sGLiPBpWU>
>
>
>
> Things you can do from here:
>
>    - Subscribe to 
> io9<http://www.google.com/reader/view/feed%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fio9.com%2Findex.xml?source=email>using
>    *Google Reader*
>    - Get started using Google 
> Reader<http://www.google.com/reader/?source=email>to easily keep up with
>    *all your favorite sites*
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "R-SPEC: The Rochester Speculative Literature Association" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<r-spec%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/r-spec?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"R-SPEC: The Rochester Speculative Literature Association" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/r-spec?hl=en.

Reply via email to