We all have those things we know stone cold totally, and those things which will not stay in the head more than a few seconds. I'll bet that if you set the pentose phosphate pathway recitation to music, you could rattle it off like the parrot sketch from Monty Python. I think Tom Lehrer taught a lot of math in his comedy songs...

Breadth or depth - it's not an either-or, I think, but more of a whichever-is-needed-most, situationally speaking. The determining factors must include those hungers to know and join and perform, the hungers with which we are all born.

Dana


On 4/20/2011 7:33 AM, Alicia Henn wrote:
Is it because "ordinary mortals" have either breadth or depth in scope? I've wondered this, as I find myself frustratingly unable to remember fine details for long periods of time, but tend to be able to think broadly (pardon the pun) about current issues. On a separate issue, I am unable to remember fine details unless they are tied into a strong narrative. The pentose phosphate pathway- I knew it once cold, but I'd have to look it up now. Dialogue from any Coen brothers' movie going back to Barton Fink? No problem.

Alicia
On Apr 19, 2011, at 9:57 AM, Dana Paxson wrote:

Wow, Eric! Your comment blew me away! What you've described resembles the kind of thing I've been trying to write for the past 15 years or so: the project that is Descending Road and the ELM supporting it! That's why I ended up with multiple POVs, multiple masters of the narrative, and threading and glossaries and references all automated - and I'm still having trouble making it comprehensible to mortals like myself. Ha!

On 4/19/2011 8:57 AM, Eric Scoles wrote:
...

Many many moons ago I conceived of a character who would be a master of memory, the end of a long lineage of such masters, who transferred their history orally and as a result, had verse and prose maps of a whole continent in their head at any given time, situated in history. It was hard writing and in the end I let that aspect of it slide, because I couldn't find a way to write the PoV of such a person and make it comprehensible to ordinary mortals.


On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Dana Paxson <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    How clearly this emerges as we try to drink from the
    informational firehoses every day.  Two thoughts:

    1)  To trust certain people with the culling tasks is to empower
    them.  In the social framework, culling can be the enemy of choice.

    2)  Surrender may be inevitable and necessary, but the fabrics
    of information are interwoven so richly and finely that many
    works inform each work we read.  The traces of Aristotle lie
    latent in most of what we read in the West.  We need not read
    Euclid's Elements to gather its meaning, because most published
    mathematical works use its paradigms.  And the few who read one
    obscure scribbler may find in their reading what will inform all
    that they write, which in turn whole worlds may read.
     Surrender, in the end, becomes a joyful swim in the great seas
    of knowledge.


    On 4/19/2011 7:43 AM, Alicia Henn wrote:

        Culling is easy; it implies a huge amount of control and
        mastery. Surrender, on the other hand, is a little sad.


        
http://www.npr.org/blogs/monkeysee/2011/04/18/135508305/the-sad-beautiful-fact-that-were-all-going-to-miss-almost-everything



-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups "R-SPEC: The Rochester Speculative Literature
    Association" group.
    To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:r-spec%[email protected]>.
    For more options, visit this group at
    http://groups.google.com/group/r-spec?hl=en.




--
--
eric scoles | [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "R-SPEC: The Rochester Speculative Literature Association" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/r-spec?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "R-SPEC: The Rochester Speculative Literature Association" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/r-spec?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "R-SPEC: The Rochester Speculative Literature Association" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/r-spec?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "R-SPEC: 
The Rochester Speculative Literature Association" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/r-spec?hl=en.

Reply via email to