Abdulaziz Ghuloum wrote:
Aubrey, what's this class of "pure interpreters" that you're concerned about? How do they semantically differ from say petite, csi, gsi, mzscheme, guile, gosh, rscheme, etc?
Doesn't adding the word "semantically" to that question rather miss the point?
Did anyone deny that the current R6 draft could be implemented, portably, atop any R5 implementation, including SCM? -t _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
