bear scripsit: > ;; implementation of assert and continuation? are left as > ;; an exercise for the reader.
It's not obvious to me that there's any principled way to define "continuation?", unless your implementation of call/cc is polite enough to tag escape procedures for you. In a CPS compiler they are interchangeable with other procedures. -- John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ccil.org/~cowan Female celebrity stalker, on a hot morning in Cairo: "Imagine, Colonel Lawrence, ninety-two already!" El Auruns's reply: "Many happy returns of the day!" _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
