--- This message is a formal comment which was submitted to [EMAIL PROTECTED], following the requirements described at: http://www.r6rs.org/process.html ---
Name: Mike Sperber email: sperber at deinprogramm dot de Type of issue: Simplification Priority: Minor R6RS component: (r6rs when-unless) Version of the report: 5.92 Summary: (r6rs when-unless) should be removed This is mainly an attempt to stimulate discussion: Given that `when' and `unless' offer little advantage over just using `if', and given that their definitions are so trivial, it's unclear whether the benefit of having a separate library with these in the standard is worth the cost. As I don't use `when' and `unless', it's clear that they're not worth the cost to me. I wonder what others think. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
