On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Abdulaziz Ghuloum wrote:
On Mar 19, 2007, at 10:08 AM, AndrevanTonder wrote:
Someone who reads this might rightfully ask how the set of exported
variables is determined. Although I think the last sentence is
logically correct, since it can be satisfied in a simple implementation
by simply potentially doing too much, e.g., creating an export location
for all non-mutated variables, the statement might trip up some readers.
Do you have a better strategy for determining the set of exports?
Since I do not use local bindings for library toplevel variables, their is no
copying-on-export, so the issue does not arise. But in your case, if one
wanted to bother, a more accurate strategy is possible if the library contained
no macros, for example.
Andre
_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
