John Cowan wrote:
The difficulty with that idea (which is what Java uses) is that
it changes the meaning of a\x20;b. Instead of being a single
symbol of three characters, it is equivalent to a b, a sequence
of two symbols.
Hmm. Yes. It would also make "\x22;" a syntax error rather than a string
containing a double quote, but that is less of a problem.
I guess one way to obtain my aim would be:
(a) To restrict non-delimited symbols to non-whitespace characters (or
perhaps restrict <constituent> to <letter> on page 12 of the draft); and
(b) To introduce a delimited symbol syntax, for example, #"...",
borrowed from Dylan.
On one hand, one would then have two forms of symbols. On the other, one
of those forms would now be very similar to strings, and, since one
would presumably be able to use escapes like \a in delimited symbols,
this would be a simplification.
This modification would also create a means to portably interchange
programs using only ASCII, although I'm not sure if this is especially
useful given UTF-8.
In order to make the conversion reversible, it's necessary to use
a pattern like Java's:
Yes, but I was not advocating that it be completely reversible, simply
noting that it appeared possible to express any Scheme program in ASCII.
Regards,
Alan
_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
