AndrevanTonder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think the sentence would still be at best ambiguous, and perhaps somewhat > inaccurate. I can think of objections to "defined by a procedure", > "calls a procedure", "run", "when expanding", and "specifically" > (since this is only one relevant use case). I would suggest instead > something like: > > For example, if a macro transformer procedure > calls a procedure from another library, then the latter library must > be instantiated before expanding any use of the macro.
How about: > For example, if a macro transformer calls a procedure from library A, > then the library A must be instantiated before expanding any use of > the macro in library B. Library A may not be needed when library B is > eventually run as part of a program, or it may be needed for run time > of library B, too. ? -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
