David Van Horn wrote: > >> | If now there is a vote for SRFI-63, I will definitely vote for no. >> >> I am sorry that you hold SRFI-63 responsible for the actions of >> someone unknown to its author. >> > > Indeed. My own inadequacies shouldn't have any bearing on the matter. > > David > > > I said "I will definitely vote for no" just because I don't think this SRFI is Scheme-ish (in my own taste), and I can't think of any real world problem that needs it. It has nothing to do with whether some implementation of it is buggy or not.
Chongkai _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
