Thomas Lord scripsit: > So, the answer is "no," thus CL did not "regress" in the way that you > claim. Since you recognize that that *would* have been a regression > then, to be consistent, you should either agree that the restrictions in > the R6 core are a regression or else convincingly distinguish the two cases.
I deny that there are any such restrictions in the R6 core. > I'm not sure why you bring that up, but... Primarily because no Scheme standard since RRRS has provided p-lists, but Chez does, and so does Chicken if you use a special build option. Other Schemes may too, for all I know. -- LEAR: Dost thou call me fool, boy? John Cowan FOOL: All thy other titles http://www.ccil.org/~cowan thou hast given away: [EMAIL PROTECTED] That thou wast born with. _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
