Abdulaziz Ghuloum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is that "Co" a typo for something else? Or should it just be removed?
No, it's intentional. Co character are meant for the private use of *applications*---they're not unassigned, which is something different. That's why Scheme implementations should treat them generically and allow them in <constituent>. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
